
In the US: Thursdays, 10/9c, ABC
In the UK: I'm guessing the Beeb will buy it. What do you think?
This is the one we in Britain have all been waiting for. Despite running for only two series, time travel cop drama Life on Mars became something akin to the crown jewels - a national treasure to be revered by everyone. Even the awfulness of spin-off Ashes to Ashes couldn't dull our love for it.
So when we heard that the US was going to adapt it, we all feared the worst and assumed terrible things were going to happen to our precious*. "Take your hands off our crown jewels, Yanks," was the general reaction.
To be fair, once we saw the trailer and the pilot, we actually had a good reason to be dismayed. The trailer was truly awful and the pilot was bland. Relocated from Manchester to LA, the show ditched most of the characters, took away a lot of the fun bits without adding anything, and didn't really have any style of its own.
And ABC agreed. It took one look and said, "Guys, do you want to try again? Because this is sh*t." So the producers did try again. They changed production team, relocated the show to New York, brought back all the old characters and rewrote the script. Then they brought in heavyweight acting talent Harvey Keitel, Gretchen Mol and Michael Imperioli – and reshot the entire thing.
Wow. They say pilots can be unrepresentative of the series that follow, but that's all pretty unprecedented – although unsurprising given just how few new dramas ABC is running with this Fall.
Has that been enough though?
Plot
Where were you in 1973? NYPD Detective Sam Tyler (Jason O'Mara) finds himself in the cultural hotbed of New York City in the tumultuous times of the Vietnam War, Watergate, women's lib and the civil and gay rights movements - without a cell phone, computer, PDA or MP3 player -- suddenly hurtled back in time when he's ripped from 2008 after being hit by a car while chasing down a criminal. He's trying mightily to understand what has just happened to him and how he can get back "home."
What exactly is going on here? It's like Sam is on a different planet. It's the Wild West out there: uncontrollable criminals, police on the take... whom can he trust? Forced to use a different moral code and without hi-tech crime fighting techniques, Sam clashes with his new boss at the 125th Precinct, the irascible Lieutenant Gene Hunt (Harvey Keitel), who would rather use his fists than his brains to solve a crime. Hunt, who has earned the adoration of the men under him, does his best to hide his humanity behind a gruff exterior and great gut instincts, in contrast to Sam's more politically correct cutting edge style. But the two begrudgingly combine to make a powerful team -- whether they like it or not.
Then there are the other squad members of the 1-2-5. Detective Ray Carling (Michael Imperioli), a big, mean guy in a street-fight with life. Ray may be a rough, tough sexist, but when the chips are down, he's a handy guy to have in your corner. Until Sam came along, Ray was the golden boy of the force and Gene's go-to guy. It's the man's man against Sam's charming wit, charisma and eerie futuristic knowledge of not just police procedure -- but the whole culture -- that puts them toe-to-toe in this face-off for Gene's approval.
Annie Norris (Gretchen Mol) is a member of the Police Women's Bureau. At a time when females were only allowed to do menial tasks and not real police work, she's the smartest person in the room. Little does she know that her dream of becoming a real cop will come true. Right now she's struggling to deal with being undermined, under-used and in general against the sexism of the times. However she's the one person Sam can turn to to help guide him in his new reality. Theirs is a strong bond. After all, they're both outcasts.
Rookie Detective Chris Skelton (Jonathan Murphy) is a sweet guy trying to make it in this uncompromising world, but right now he's out of his league with Gene and Ray. He's impressed with Sam's new way of looking at and thinking about policing, but that means he's at odds with Gene and his old school style.
In his 2008 life, Sam was in love with Maya Daniels (Lisa Bonet) and, although Maya and Annie will never meet, Annie's workplace battles have paved the way for Maya to become a full-fledged cop. But a fascinating, unique love triangle evolves between Sam's "real" in-the-moment friendship with Annie, his longing to get back to Maya and the fantasy of what could be.
At home in Sam's apartment building in the East Village, there's Windy, a free-spirited, post-hippie chick who can teach Sam a thing or two about the cultural revolution taking place in front of his unbelieving eyes.
Just how will Sam deal with all this ambiguity while trying to remain a top detective, as he desperately attempts to get back to 2008? He might just find things aren't so dissimilar in New York circa 1973 and 2008.
"Life on Mars" stars Jason O'Mara ("In Justice," "Grey's Anatomy," "Men in Trees") as Sam Tyler, Harvey Keitel ("Bugsy," "Reservoir Dogs," "The Piano," "Pulp Fiction," "Mean Streets") as Lieutenant Gene Hunt, Michael Imperioli ("The Sopranos," "Oprah Winfrey Presents: Mitch Albom's For One More Day") as Detective Ray Carling, Gretchen Mol ("3:10 to Yuma," "The Notorious Bettie Page") as Annie Norris and Jonathan Murphy ("October Road") as Detective Chris Skelton. Lisa Bonet ("High Fidelity," "Enemy of the State," "The Bill Cosby Show") will appear as a recurring guest star as Maya Daniels.
Josh Appelbaum ("Alias," "October Road"), André Nemec ("Alias," "October Road") and Scott Rosenberg ("October Road") are executive producers. "Life on Mars" is produced by 20th Century Fox Television and ABC Studios.
Is it any good?
Certainly compared to the pilot it is. Oddly, it's like a music mix. They had an hour's worth of material from the original BBC starter episode to work with, which they condensed down to 40 minutes for the pilot and the first episode of the US series. But they've chosen different emphases and different material in the two cases.
So everything still looks very much like the BBC original, it's just that some things that were in the pilot have been left out and other things put back in.
Many of the changes have been for the better. The move to New York is undoubtedly a good idea and the producers have actually done some research about the time and established a sense of place, including a breathtaking shot of the Twin Towers, something sorely lacking from the pilot. The 2008 police work no longer looks like science fiction in its own right, but something far, far closer to normal world policing. It's in these areas that much of the original material has been restored and of course updated for the new setting.
The restoration of Ray and Chris, as well as the rampant sexism and the changes in police procedure since 1973, are undoubtedly good moves, too. In particular, Michael Imperioli's Ray is a more plausible character than his British equivalent and better acted, too - as is Chris. Sam's no longer the macho hero of the pilot - he's more like his PC, slightly nancy British self - so spars well will both Ray and Gene. And Gene's "man of the people" policing is back in there to contrast with Sam's by-the-book style, even if his choice of cookies differs.
Lastly, Gretchen Mol's Annie is by far the best version of the character so far. Not only does she benefit from having a decent actress playing her, her character's been bolstered with better writing: she's not just someone for Sam to confide him, she's a proper character now. And she's blonde, which is always A Good Thing.
New material
But the show's writers have changed things from the original as well and added new material, too. The end scene has changed to a new take on an old philosophical conundrum, which actually works quite well. Nelson the bar keeper's been replaced by a white guy; Colin's got a brother; Maya, Sam's 2008 girlfriend, is being played by The Cosby Show's Lisa Bonet so you can bet she's going to pop up in flashforwards and dream sequences at some point; there's going to be a neighbour for Sam; and some key sequences have been extended to up the action quotient - something that the episode's director does much better than his/her British predecessor did, even if everything else is almost shot-by-shot identical. We might even have a different reason for why Sam's in the past.
There are a few problems, though. Harvey Keitel's a bit frail looking these days so doesn't seem quite the match for Sam that he should be. He's also been saddled with some quite bad new dialogue, and his delivery is a bit lacking in naturalism - he's nowhere near Philip Glenister's level of skill yet, but given this is his first television role, I'm willing to give him some time to get up to speed. And Jason O'Mara, while he's improved since the pilot, is still no John Simm.
There's also the music. The soundtrack is fantastic, with the likes of The Who and The Rolling Stones now getting a look in**. But the composed music is clearly trying to be of the early 70s cop show genre, and sounds correspondingly shite.
So actually, this is quite good. I'm definitely willing to give it the benefit of the doubt for now and once it grows beyond the original British scripts, we'll be able to see if it's its own beast or not. It has the potential, now they're actually confronting the police corruption, brutality and sexism of the era straight on, to be as worthwhile a look at the times as the British series was.
Here's a YouTube promo and the ABC Life on Mars starter kit
* We didn't really give a monkey's when we heard Spanish TV was going to get its mitts on it, though, did we? That's fair isn't it? Because Spanish TV always produces the highest quality dramas
** Do all New York-based dramas now need to include The Who's Baba O'Riley in the soundtrack? cf CSI: NY
Updates and related entries
October 28, 2008: A review of the first three episodes of the US version of Life on Mars



October 10, 2008 | Reply
[this is good] I watched this last night (well most of it -- I was channel-hopping between this, ER and Saving Grace [sorry, Rob, still enjoying the last]), and was quite taken with it. In an interesting coincidence, the original Life on Mars is being repeated on BBCCanada right afterward, so it was really interesting to be able to compare the two so readily. The American one has way too many commercials, of course, and is not helped by the Canadian channel's cutesy-come-cool trivia spots about the show. The British version has more wry humour than the American version, which I missed. However, I had no complaints about the acting (especially the smaller character roles) and Sam's reaction to the recently-completed Twin Towers was a nice touch. There are enough differences in the interpretation of the characters (notably that of Annie) to make this worth watching without suffering in the comparison. After the travesty that was Viva Laughlin, this was a pleasant surprise. I wish they weren't showing it on Thursday evening, though.
October 10, 2008 | Reply
The Twin Towers shot was powerful stuff, so I think that should have been held off until after he had gone through the scene back at the 125th. Sam could think that everything had been re-arranged and others had been brought in to act like cops as a joke. Hard to explain away the WTC coming back though. Once he saw that, there should have been no question he was back in 1973 somehow.
I liked it though, especially that ending scene and the philosophical problem. Reminded me of Herbert Lom in "The Dead Zone". And I liked how they handled the Maya situation - that was an improvement over the original.
For now, this will be week to week for me. I just hope that if it should ever get cancelled, they'll be able to wrap it up one way or another.
October 10, 2008 | Reply
You are entitled to ignore my advice and to disagree with me really - even I disagree with myself and ignore my own advice, otherwise I wouldn't have watched all of Samantha Who? recently, which is a lot better than I gave it credit for, mainly thanks to Christina Applegate.
I don't know why Thursday's and Monday's schedules are so crammed, when Wednesday is pretty much a desert (yes, I know Pushing Daisies and Dirty Sexy Money are on, but all the same).
October 10, 2008 | Reply
Whenever there's a time travel/space travel drama where whoever it is didn't intend to travel and can't quite believe it, I cut them a lot of slack. Frankly, the obvious and only really acceptable answer is "I'm hallucinating/have paranoid schizophrenia" (cf Lost in Austen) so if one moment there's incontrovertible evidence in one scene, I'm not so fussed if they suddenly get an attack of "Hang on… what am I thinking? This can't possibly be true" later on.
October 11, 2008 | Reply
This sounds really good. And I liked Ashes to Ashes.
October 11, 2008 | Reply
You can run the fan club then. The meetings might get a bit lonely though.
October 11, 2008 | Reply
Oi, Rob, Marie's not the only one. There will be two o us. I liked Ashes to Ashes. It appealed to my inner Eighties child and it was a rather unnerving experience suddenly realising I found Gene Hunt sexy. Especially in that last episode...
October 12, 2008 | Reply
I liked 'Ashes To Ashes', mostly for the soundtrack and, being the sexist pig that I am, for that closeup from the locked file room in the bunker. But unlike the original 'Life On Mars', it's not a show I'd want to watch again. And the ending, while interesting*, didn't move me like 'LoM' did (and still does).
*I was clueless about the clown connection, so that did catch me by surprise.
October 13, 2008 | Reply
That's a chairman, a secretary and a treasurer then. Is that enough for a quorum? And who's going to splash out for the hob nobs?
October 13, 2008 | Reply
I'll get some Jaffa Cakes. Not keen on Hobnobs.
October 14, 2008 | Reply
I much, much, much preferred Ashes To Ashes to the original Life On Mars. In part because I can't really fully get into shows without strong female characters and LOM's Annie was dreadful.
October 14, 2008 | Reply
I agree that LoM's Annie was dreadful, both as written and acted (much preferring Gretchen Mol's Annie as a result).
However, I do feel that AtA's Alex Drake was more a mirage of a strong woman than an actual strong woman – everyone's so desperate for decent female characters in the general desert of TV, there's a temptation to hallucinate one where there isn't one. On paper, she should be good but on-screen, I just wanted bad bad things to happen to the condescending, patronising, dumb, "I'll just complain about how women are treated but not actually do anything about it myself since I'm too busy stalking my dead mother" insult to Gloria Steinem all the time. Which given she's shot in the head in the first episode, should have been enough, but it wasn't.
And the writing on Ashes to Ashes was pretty horrific, bar a couple of good episodes.
October 14, 2008 | Reply
While she wasn't my favourite ever, I didn't mind her, perhaps because they established so well that she never really took her seeming time travel at all seriously - the only thing she was really interested in changing was whatever psychological riddle was stopping her from waking up. And I thought she was funny. However, after the last episode, they may need to deepen Alex's character as presumably now she will accept on some level that she is where she seems to be.
October 14, 2008 | Reply
Sorry, you'll both have to answer to me for the Annie hatin'! LOL And I know I'm not the only one. (Hello? Guys? Back me up here!)
I loved Liz White in the show. I was sorry there was really no way to keep her in the sequel
October 14, 2008 | Reply
I'll back you up, Toby! While I've enjoyed the new interpretation of Annie in the American version so far, I also liked the British Annie in the person of Liz White. She looked like an authentic seventies girl, for one thing, plump and pretty. She acted like one, too (as I give away my age...). Right up into the eighties, women were still hog-tied by expectations, regulations and laws. (Some would argue that we still are.) I would say that the British Annie is as pro-active as her situation allows.
October 14, 2008 | Reply
"Some would argue that we still are"
I would...
My problem with Annie (UK) isn't one of pro-activeness (that's part of my argument with Alex Drake), it's
a) Liz White's not a great actress, IMO, and any line of dialogue seems to come out of her mouth like she's reading from the phone directory (I feel harsh saying that but it's true)
b) she's dull. As in would I want to spend any amount of time talking to her, for fear I'd fall asleep halfway through a sentence?
October 15, 2008 | Reply
Toby, I liked the locker room scene too, but for completely different (!) reasons - in my own sexist way, I thought Gene Hunt showed an incredibly tender side which I found fabulously sexy (cf Daniel Craig in THAT shower scene in the last Bond movie).
Andrea, I really liked Alex because I thought she was utterly barking and I found her postmodern psychobabble explanations of what was happening ot her hilarious. I particularly liked the scene where she drove the pink tank (sorry Rob).
Annie, hmm, I can see what you're saying Persephone and I don't hate her as much as Rob, but I did just for once want her to ask Sam a sensible question like, what the f*** are you on about? Are you totally mad?? I found her a bit of a drip, but I did like the way Sam reacted to her.
October 15, 2008 | Reply
The pink tank was fun. If the whole show had been like that, I'd have been happy.