As you (hopefully) all know by now, I've been running a readers' survey since before Christmas to see what sort of things you guys want on this blog, partly to make sure you all have fun here but also partly to make sure I don't die an early death from over-work and stress.
Anyway, the polls closed on Friday, the results are in and what's going to happen next is after the jump. I was going to use charts and graphs to break it all down, but that seemed like a lot of effort and would somewhat have undermined my point about not doing too much work.
First of all, I'd like to thank everyone who took the time to vote and let me know what you liked and disliked. I'd also like to thank everyone who said nice things about the blog: it's very kind of you and much appreciated! I'd also like to thank those brave few lurkers - andrea, Ms Heathen, telesnap, Morjana and AndyB - who took the trouble to de-lurk. Thanks guys: if it weren't for you, the blog really would have been doomed!
Here then are the results:
The daily news
Still by far the biggest drain on my time, plus doing it makes me get up early in the morning. If I ever get SAD, I'll blame it. The big problem is it's daily and there's not much point in my doing it if I drop back the frequency, so it's quite a binary thing - do it or don't do it. For me, it was the most tempting of the blog's features to drop since it's anything up to three hours' work a week.
All the same, it seems to be very popular with many of you - although not universally - and enough lurkers and near-lurkers voted for it to convince me that it has a place here, still. The fact that the writers' strike in the US means it takes me a little less time than before to do has also helped to keep it on. However, the fact so few lurkers de-lurked to say they loved it, despite having over a week of encouragement, means it's on probation and I reserve the right to dump it if I start wailing in pain and misery from stress at some point in the future or people give up commenting on it.
Although one person requested that Doctor Who/Torchwood/Sarah Jane news got integrated into the British TV section, no one else seemed to agree so it'll be staying separate.
Film and event reviews
Erm. I hardly ever write them, no one voted for me to do more of them - or in fact mentioned them - so guess what: I doubt there will be any more.
DVD reviews
Again, no one mentioned them specifically. But the occasional one might still pop up in the future, if I've reviewed something for a magazine. Clearly, though, not many people find them useful so I won't be going out of my way to do more.
The Carusometer/TV reviews
Well, The Carusometer turned out to be far less popular than previously thought. Poor old Carusometer. On the other hand, it does have a loyal bunch of followers. In terms of work, though, The Carusometer itself isn't much effort - a half hour at most and that typically only occurs once per series (not season. Series) - so cutting back on it won't actually accomplish much. It's the watching that takes the time rather than doing a graph.
So here's the plan on that front.
- For starters (and again the writers' strike is going to help here), there are going to be no more Random Carusometers except very occasionally when I have the time and I'm craving the need to watch something, anything.
- There are going to be fewer third and fifth episode verdicts - if something's truly arse in the first episode or I just have no interest in it, I won't stick around to see if it's gone up a couple of points (cf Cashmere Mafia, Lipstick Jungle, Painkiller Jane, Women's Murder Club, Cane, etc), which should save me 3-5 hours per show.
- Since The Carusometer's verdicts don't seem to appeal so much, I'll be switching to a simple numeric result (eg 0-5), rather than a “corresponds to” (eg “a show in which David Caruso would guest star as ”), which should be a little more comprehendible and less off-the-wall for some people. That is unless people stick up for the verdicts now.
There was a call from a few people for more reviews specifically of British TV. I've always held back on that for a couple of reasons:
- Mostly, I hate it
- The only potentially good stuff is in the evenings. I probably won't be watching it but taping it then watching it the next day then reviewing it maybe the day after that. In the whizzy world of the web, that's too slow and I'm not going to work weekends and evenings to remedy it. That way lies madness.
As a little test, I did review a couple of British shows to see how popular that feature might be and the results weren't very encouraging in terms of commenting, although given this is a blog that's really been about new US shows, old British shows and Doctor Who, that wasn't wholly surprising (plus I did pick a few odd shows to start with). So British TV reviews probably won't be cropping up as much as I'd planned and will be on probation as well. If things start to pick up, I might well try sitting through some more of the bilge; if not, it'll be less than frequent and will be confined to the usual suspects.
Audio plays
Far more support for audio plays than for British TV, so that bit will be staying. Ms Rullsenberg's suggestion of reviewing Big Finish's back catalogue is a fine one, since it requires minimal effort, has no especial deadline and can keep me going for years. I doubt I'll be expanding to other ranges, though.
Miscellaneous
Well, despite my pointing out things like The Canon, memes, et al, no one really asked for more of them specifically, so more general writing on TV, etc probably won't be happening. On the other hand, there were quite a few people who said they enjoyed everything about the blog, and without it, this'll just be reviews and news, which ain't really that great in the scheme of things. So I'll keep some on as the occasional glue that binds everything together. Questions and realisations did get an acknowledgement from at least one person so that will re-appear at random intervals. There was a request for more episode-by-episode reviews, which would be so much work, I'm not going to go there, although I am tempted to do the occasional recap. Book reviews I really don't have the time for, I'm afraid, Scott.
Things to come
I'm going to be busy most of this week, so there won't be much time for me to write about anything beyond Torchwood's first new episode, a preview of Jericho's second season and maybe (if I have the time, otherwise it'll be shunted into next week) a one-off look at some new Canadian shows, including The Border, JPod and Sophie.
Longer-term, I'm working on a proper re-design for the blog to lift it out of the Web dark ages and give it more of a focus, although that'll be a while in coming (for obvious time reasons). I'll also be looking at older shows and movies that I have sitting around in my collection or I've seen at some point and which I feel like talking about. That will see the launch of the “Sepia-coloured Carusometer”, BTW. I can hear the cries of joy, already.
If, now the results are in, you realise that one of your much-cherished features is about to disappear now's your chance to speak out, particularly if you haven't spoken out so far - it's not too late to save things or suggest new features! And thanks again for voting and indeed taking the time to read the blog at all! You're all very kind.





















January 14, 2008 | Reply
I kept meaning to vote but... well, I was a bit rubbish about it.
As a regular reader of the Daily News I think you could get away with a (long) weekly version, as most of the items relate to movies and shows that are still weeks, months or even years away.
January 14, 2008 | Reply
It's a nice idea, but I think it would probably still take a reasonable amount of time in aggregate, even assuming that all the news articles in my RSS feed reader didn't disappear by Friday - it's the reading the feeds that takes the time, not writing. And I'd still need to find the time to do it. I can slot in 45 minutes before I head off for a train on a Friday. I can't slot in 3-5x45 minutes.
The other thing is that I'm not actually writing the news, I'm just aggregating. If I only aggregate once a week, I'm pretty sure, as AndyB suggests, that the regular daily news readers will start looking for other sources so they're not behind in their news or starting reading all the feeds for themselves. Many probably already are and so are ahead of most of the daily news or don't bother reading it at all. Moving to a weekly publishing schedule would get rid of the remainder. And then I'd be wasting 3-5x45 minutes a week on writing something that nobody at all wants to read.
So I think it really is a case of daily or nothing.
January 14, 2008 | Reply
Daily News - love it, keep it, but feel free to drop if the work is too much
Film and Event Reviews - I ain't pressing, but I'm just a voice
DVD reviews - I like the selected ones you do since they are usually for core bits of sci-fi and as you mention are usually drawn from other sources. nice if you can...
Carusometer - ah, glad he is likely to stay but a TAD saddened that the variations on the ratings may go. Sigh. mind, you have given me HOURS of fun with your variations on the sunglasses and Caruso's ego.
TV reviews - I'm not pressing for more Brit TV reviews, mostly as you say there is too much shite and what you do cover already suits me fine. ;)
Audio Plays - ooh, happy clapping! Some choice reviews, extra funny, scathing or praising sound grand to me!
Misc - I do like your provocative statements and rather more random pieces: they also break the flow of provision on other things. Be nice to see a few pop up...
Things to come - ah, Torchwood....
January 14, 2008 | Reply
Despite myself, I actually enjoy Womens Murder Club, but not for the female camaraderie or any of their individual personalities: I just really love procedurals. We need to import some of the better ones to here, like Australia's fantastic City Homicide. I'm trying to get my hands on some older, acclaimed Australian procedurals, like Water Rats, but I'm not having any luck with my sources and my sources' sources.
I see that Blue Murder is now in the US on DVD, but I also love Caroline Quentin in Jonathan Creek, and as far as I know, that hasn't made it to the US.
January 15, 2008 | Reply
Hello! After reading today's post, I felt guilty and finally decided to come out of the lurking closet.
For me the best part of the blog is the stuff on the quality American shows, reviews or daily news, because it usually has a UK perspective. Knowing when it's coming over here, if it's any good, what channel it's on, things like that are genuinely useful, (although I should say that I've only been reading for a few months and always found the Carusometer a bit bewildering).
The random stuff is good as well because it makes it seem more personal.
I quite liked seeing the UK reviews recently, because I tend to watch more home grown stuff out of laziness it was interesting to see how your opinions tally up with the other stuff. There is good stuff there, 'Thank God You're Here' on ITV on Saturday night was really promising start I thought.
Anyway, I'm rambling now, obviously if you've got better things to do like having a life, eating more fruit, taking exercise etc then I suppose you should just ignore everyone really!
January 15, 2008 | Reply
Thanks for de-lurking! Every reader counts so maybe I will do a bit more British TV then. I'll search harder
January 16, 2008 | Reply
A lurker delurks to say he was away for Christmas and didn't get a chance to vote, but thumbs up for the great site and hope you keep the daily news.
January 16, 2008 | Reply
Cheers! Looks like the daily news might be staying - assuming there is any, of course.
Thanks for de-lurking, BTW, and hope you had a great Christmas!