Wednesday morning's eye-opening and independent news

Posted on July 4, 2007 | 30 comments |

David Tennant and Catherine Tate

Happy Independence Day, America!

Doctor Who

  • And the new companion is… Catherine Tate. Seriously. I'm not fibbing

Film

  • David Oyelowo, Idris Elba, Colin Salmon, Winston Ntshona and John Kani are all in The No 1 Ladies' Detective Agency

Journalism

British TV

  • Keeley Hawes is the new John Simm for Life on Mars sequel Ashes to Ashes
  • The Beeb says the viewing public wants it to innovate
  • Michael Grade says TV shouldn't treat the viewing public with 'casual contempt'
  • Oh yeah? Well, ITV are copycats, says the Beeb [free registration required]

US TV

Updates and related entries

June 21, 2008: Happy third birthday, The Medium Is Not Enough

Subscribe to the daily news by RSS or email

Read other posts about: , , , ,

30 Comments For This Post

  1. TemplarJ wrote:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    Catherine Tate.
    I didn't believe it when I heard because it sounds like the kind of waffle a fan with no imagination would come up with. Or a tabloid journo. But it's true. Blimey. As a one off, fine. As a regular, she's too old to make a good identification figure for the kiddies, too ginger to work as tottie and Donna Noble was nothing but a comedy foil in her previous appearance. A good foil, but I can't see that being sustained over an entire series.
    Ah well, at least CSI was good.

  2. Rullsenberg replied to TemplarJ's comment:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    Not exactly wild about the casting of CT. I'll reserve judgement as best as I can.


    Agree about CSI though. Bloody ToBe though...

  3. Rob Buckley replied to TemplarJ's comment:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    Well, Martha is coming back after a few episodes so I imagine that they picked Tate for all those reasons. i.e. So she wouldn't be alternative totty for the Doctor and even Marie would be welcoming Martha back with open arms at the appointed hour.

    Actually, I kind of like the idea. Sort of 1st Doctor and Barbara for the PSP generation.

  4. Craig wrote:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    Worst. Decision. Ever. Personally, I don't understand the thinking eitehr?¢‚Ǩ‚ÄùWho's doing fine from a rating's standpoint, and if they wanted someone from a previous episode, surely Sally Sparrow (who was actually good AND not horribly annoying) would have fitted the bill? Perhaps the rumours that RTD was going to kill the show and leave were true. Expect Paris Hilton and Joe Pasquale to also be named as companions this week.

  5. Rosby wrote:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    Re: Catherine Tate; I'm trying to be reasonable, rational, unbiased and accepting of this...but WHAAAAT? NOOOOO! THEY CAN'T!

    ...ahem. Sorry. Not a massive fan.

  6. Rob Buckley wrote:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    Thing is, she's quite popular with Joe Public. Her show's popular. Runaway Bride was popular. My wife - who is not a Who fan but a casual viewer and whom I use for market research as per Leslie Ash in The Happy Apple - thought it was good news. She likes Tate, and liked Tate in Runaway Bride. She liked the idea of a non-stick insect companion who's not trying to be the ideal woman.

    Dramatically, I can also see what they're doing: building up the Doctor post-Rose as this alien figure who doesn't consort with ladies that frequently and who really just likes companionship - Rose being special and an aberration. It'll also give Martha someone to squabble and be friends with, which will probably appeal to younger kids, too.

    We're fans. He has our hearts and minds already. He's after everyone else now. Tate is a weapon of war, my friends.

  7. Stu Nathan wrote:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    At least she'll only do one series!

  8. Marie wrote:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    Er, what? OK. I don't really know what I think of that, I need to watch Runaway Bride again. And pay particular attention to all of her friends and family in that, as I suppose we'll be seeing them all again too.

  9. Scott Matthewman wrote:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    Oh no! Ex-RSC and West End actress joins the TARDIS! It'll be a complete and utter fucking disaster, you mark my words...

    In reality, Tate's a very good dramatic actress. In the scenes in The Runaway Bride where the script allowed that to come through, it was clear that she and Tennant can work very well together. A full series of 13 episodes won't have the broad comedy aspect that Russell wrote into a Christmas Day special episode, so I'm looking forward to seeing how the character of Donna develops over a three month period on screen.

  10. Rob Buckley replied to Scott Matthewman's comment:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    I do, actually, have to kind of agree. I like Tate, although I really hate her BBC2 show. And Donna was actually quite likeable by the end of Runaway Bride. We might get some adult emotions from the companion for a change, too.

    See, I'm an optimist really.

  11. TemplarJ wrote:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    I don't think Martha will be back for more than a few episodes. I think there is a bucket of PR spin in the 'she's back next year, we like her really' press release.

  12. Stu Nathan replied to TemplarJ's comment:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    But if this is Tennant's last season, and if both Martha and Donna don't continue past the end of series 4, that means we start the next series with a new companion and a new Doctor. Big problem. I reckon Martha will stay for the start of series 5 then bugger off again.

  13. Mark H Wilkinson wrote:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    It was easy to be optimistic about Tate when you knew it was just a one-off; and while I thought she did alright in TRB, I'm not sure how that will translate into series regular.

    It's an odd choice, age-wise.

    And she looks like the back end of a bus.

  14. Marie wrote:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    The more people complain about what Catherine Tate looks like the more enthusiastic I am about her as companion. We may have David Tennant now but the Doctor hasn't exactly been a looker in the past. That doesn't matter, seeing as it's actually about the *character*. If you can't cope with one less than beautiful companion then that is a bit sad.

  15. Rob Buckley wrote:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    Poor lass. I think she looks quite nice, myself.

    Marie: didn't you have a go at Steven Moffat a while back for being "very ugly"?

  16. Poly wrote:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    You got to love RTD, he is a born troublenaker :)
    I like it a lot. People complaining that they don't like her character at TRB - immature, not engaged with the world, shrill - they miss an important point about Doctor Who: at the heart of the programme, it's the premise that people can get better, can change their life and they often do because of the Doctor's example. If Donna hasn't changed for the better, it's not the character who has failed, it's the Doctor. She will be different and on top of that, I liked her instinct, her tenderness and her insight.

  17. AnnaWaits wrote:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    Good choice, I reckon. I thought she was good during the Christmas special once she'd calmed down, and she's starting from a point of (basically) full knowledge, so we don't have to have the 'bigger on the inside' conversation for the fourth time. She won't fawn over the Doctor, and being that bit older, she'll pull him up on things. Maybe the choice is a bit of a cop out, but it gets a (at least tentative) thumbs up from me.

  18. espedair wrote:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    I agree with Marie and Anna, this could be a total winner. Don't forget we all doubted Billie would be good when she came back for the re-launch and now if I see one more 'Rose was the best ever, ever ever' website I'll shout!

    I think Catherine could be an excellent choice.. I can't remember if she finally did get married but this totally fits in with the Dr and companion thing... something a bit different, maybe more drama (hopefully not so much comedy!)

    The only thing I don't agree with is all these comments about Gingers! OI!

    *ahem*

  19. Mark H Wilkinson replied to Marie's comment:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    Well, it's not her looks that'll necessarily kill it for me. Those estuarial tones strangling their way out of the TV speakers on a weekly basis are far more of a concern.

    That said, since the early days of the show, it has been a traditionally accepted part of the role of companion to not risk cracking mirrors; those that could tended not to be sole companion. And there's the added thing of age: exactly to what demographic is she expected to appeal? There were Rose wannabes out there. Who wants to be a Donna Noble?

  20. Marie wrote:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    Oh god, I don't mean to turn this into a big argument, but again, some of the Doctors have been old too, and that didn't seem to matter. Demographic? Good characters are worth watching, bad characters aren't, full stop. If you don't like Donna that's fine, but her being old / ugly isn't a good enough reason in my opinion. If this is breaking the companion-must-first-and-foremost-be-eye-candy rule, then I'm all for it. Surely it's healthy for girls to aspire to being a character whose worth is not entirely tied up in their youth and beauty?

    As for Steven Moffat, you had one little opportunity to put up a picture of David Tennant, which you *never* do...

  21. Rob Buckley replied to Marie's comment:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    I apologise. I'm a very bad man.

  22. TemplarJ wrote:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    I actually find Catherine Tate quite attractive. Am I going to hell?

  23. Rob Buckley replied to TemplarJ's comment:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    Only if it bovvers you.

  24. Marie wrote:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    I just watched The Runaway Bride again and I'm feeling very cheerful about the return of Donna now. She slaps the Doctor twice. I don't think we need to worry about her being wet...

    ...which reminds me...

    ...Whatever happened to the famous Martha swimming pool scene? Did I miss it?

  25. Stu Nathan wrote:
    July 4, 2007 | Reply

    The Martha swimming scene was taken out at script stage. Never filmed.

  26. Mark H Wilkinson replied to Marie's comment:
    July 5, 2007 | Reply

    some of the Doctors have been old too, and that didn't seem to matter

    Tell you what, Marie, we'll get a raddled old tramp in instead of Tennant. And Rob can post pictures of him every week. 'Cause, you know, the Doctor's appearance has no bearing on your liking of the show, does it?

  27. Rob Buckley replied to Mark H Wilkinson's comment:
    July 5, 2007 | Reply

    Been there, done that ?¢‚Ǩ‚Äú Sylvester McCoy

  28. Mark H Wilkinson replied to Rob Buckley's comment:
    July 5, 2007 | Reply

    Yeah. And what a howler of a casting choice that was.

  29. Rob Buckley replied to Mark H Wilkinson's comment:
    July 5, 2007 | Reply

    He was the only one prepared to work for a meal or spare change.

  30. Marie wrote:
    July 5, 2007 | Reply

    Actually my top choice for the next Doctor would be Bill Bailey, and it certainly isn't my hormones speaking. But while DT is the Doc yes let's look at him, and I have never complained about the foxiness of Billie or Freema - but please, let's not make it the only casting criterion.

Leave a comment

Your comment
You can use HTML tags for style. To hide a spoiler, put <span class="spoiler"> before it and </span> after it.


Comment preview

Subscribe to comments
You can subscribe by email to any further comments on this entry by checking the box below.

Featured Articles

Wallander 1x1

It's grim up north

Read the article

Asides

  • Mon 24 Nov: I'm going to be very busy until Thursday so chances are I won't be doing much reviewing of Survivors, 24: Redemption et al. Sorry!
  • Tue 18 Nov: Does it count in the CSI: Miami drinking game if David Caruso and Emily Procter are apparently in the same scene together, but they never speak to each other and you never see both their faces at the same time?
  • Sat 15 Nov: The Ascent of Money "sponsored by Cayman Islands". Huh. What's going on there then?
RSS feed