Categorised | Fall 2007

Tags | None

Preview: Pushing Daisies

Posted on July 23, 2007 | 5 comments |

Pushing Daisies

In the US: Wednesdays, 8/7c, ABC. Starts in the Fall
In the UK: ITV1/ITV2

The French have a lot to answer for. The Napoleonic Wars, Michelin, the croque-monsieur: all are listed in their various crimes against humanity. Also on the list is the concept of the auteur, first proposed in Cahiers du cinéma back in the 50s. In short, it's the idea that a film should be a reflection of a director's personal vision.

Zut alors! Between the DoP, editor, visual effects team, producer, actors, production staff and the assembled multitudes for any movie, how can the director be entirely responsible for its look and style?

Nevertheless, there are some auteurs out there: Michael Mann, Darren Aronofsky, et al – all give films a particular, recognisable style.

There are television auteurs, too. Bryan Fuller is one. Responsible (among others) for Dead Like Man, Heroes and Wonderfalls, he's now come up with another modern fairytale called Pushing Daisies, in which a man is blessed/cursed with the power to bring people back from the dead.

Don't believe me? Okay, how many heroes of modern TV shows can you name who are pie-makers? Hmm. Okay, you've got a point with Richard Griffiths in Pie in the Sky. And that can bring the dead back to life? Ha. Got you there.

Plot
Ned (Lee Pace) is but a young boy when he discovers that he can bring the dead back to life by touching them. Unfortunately, if they live, another must die, so he ensures that those he returns to life die within a minute thanks to a second touch. A private detective (Chi McBride) discovers his ability and they soon come to a lucrative arrangement in which Ned raises murder victims from the dead, asks them who killed them and then sends them on their way.

But when one murder victim turns out to be his childhood love, Chuck (Anna Friel), Ned restores her to life permanently.

Is it any good?
How much do you like fairy tales? Because Pushing Daisies is an out and out fairy tale. Complete with British narrator (Alan Dale - you know, him off the Carry On movies), this is a primary-coloured (mainly thanks to director and former DoP Barry Sonnenfeld - he of the Addams Family films) little tale of childhood sweethearts, chaste love, eccentric little people living ordinary lives and whimsical situations.

Me? I'm mushy hearted in the extreme, but even I thought it a little too coy and arch. These aren't adults - they're children in adults' bodies. Ned can never touch Chuck because that will kill her, so they will be eternally writing their names on tree trunks rather than having an adult relationship. This could be a plot point and a major area for character development, but here it's just a piece of fairy-tale writing that only prevents hugs, nothing else.

Still, it's touching, Chi McBride shows what a great character actor he is, Friel manages to hide her British accent well and be a relatively enchanting female lead, and it looks really, really good. Plus Lee Pace is currently frontrunner in 2007 “Young Arye Gross Lookalike” awards, so it's worth looking in for that.

If you're really in touch with your inner child, this will appeal, but if your tolerance for saccharine is low, you'll bail by episode two at the latest. I'm holding out for talking animals.

Here's a great big YouTube trailer for you.

Updates and related entries

October 19, 2007: My third-episode verdict on Pushing Daisies

5 Comments For This Post

  1. Toby OB wrote:
    July 24, 2007 | Reply

    I've read that this was originally going to be a sub-plot on 'Dead Like Me' had it lasted another season. So if 'Pushing Daisies' might have worked as part of 'Dead Like Me', why not the opposite? I'm hoping we'll see one or two of the actors from that show appear in the new series.

    And Mandy Patinkin has some free time now....

  2. Cindylover1969 wrote:
    July 24, 2007 | Reply

    Between the DoP, editor, visual effects team, producer, actors, production staff and the assembled multitudes for any movie, how can the director be entirely responsible for its look and style?

    Forgotten somebody? Arguably the person without whom none of them would even be there in the first place? The... er... writer(s)?

  3. Cindylover1969 wrote:
    July 24, 2007 | Reply

    Oh, and Pushing Daisies sounds as if it's right up my alley in the same way that The Wire isn't.

  4. Electric Dragon wrote:
    July 29, 2007 | Reply

    Do you mean Jim Dale? He was the one in the Carry On films. Alan Dale is The Treacherous Vice President Formerly Known As Jim Robinson.

  5. Rob Buckley replied to Electric Dragon's comment:
    July 29, 2007 | Reply

    Course I do. Oops. I was too busy thinking about Robin Hood at that time, I suspect.

    Me and names. One of these days, I'm actually going to get one right.

Leave a comment

Your comment
You can use HTML tags for style. To hide a spoiler, put <span class="spoiler"> before it and </span> after it.


Comment preview

Subscribe to comments
You can subscribe by email to any further comments on this entry by checking the box below.

Featured Articles

Wallander 1x1

It's grim up north

Read the article

Asides

  • Mon 24 Nov: I'm going to be very busy until Thursday so chances are I won't be doing much reviewing of Survivors, 24: Redemption et al. Sorry!
  • Tue 18 Nov: Does it count in the CSI: Miami drinking game if David Caruso and Emily Procter are apparently in the same scene together, but they never speak to each other and you never see both their faces at the same time?
  • Sat 15 Nov: The Ascent of Money "sponsored by Cayman Islands". Huh. What's going on there then?
RSS feed