Categorised | TV reviews

Tags | None

Spousal wisdom passed on about a couple of programmes: The Tudors, How The Edwardians Spoke

Posted on May 8, 2007 | 4 comments |

I still haven't convinced her to watch any Heroes, but my wife has been providing input on a couple of programmes. Since some of you seemed to be interested in her opinions, I thought I'd pass them on.

First up, I introduced her to The Tudors. She's on a bit of a Tudor thing at the moment, and is practically begging to go to Hampton Court some time soon, so I thought I'd give her something in the interim. Her verdict? “Everything's out of sync. Henry's too serious: at that point he was much more happy-go-lucky. Buckingham was more powerful and had Henry's ear, too.” And Jonathan Rhys Meyers looks absolutely nothing like Henry is supposed to. So, entertaining as it might be, the general verdict is that timelines have been accelerated and various things fudged to make it entertaining.

We also tuned into How The Edwardians Spoke on BBC4 on Sunday. Within the last four years, a load of recordings made of British prisoners of war by an Austrian academic have turned up. The general idea of the programme, we thought, was to show how accents have changed since the time of the Edwardians. Could have been good, no?

Instead, we got an accent coach zooming round the country, patronising people and bursting into sniffles at the slightest provocation - but precious little hard information on accent change.

To me, it had all the signs of BBC4-ness and an over-commission: give a producer an hour then they discover there's only half an hour to fill it with, so a load of completely redundant waffling is added. It seemed more like a vanity trip for the accent coach rather than anything else. Could we not have had a professor of linguistics or something?

My wife's verdict was much the same and since she's an expert on such matters, I'll pass it on to you. “It's rubbish. Her theory on accents is ridiculous.” Said accent coach seemed to believe that accents mirror the surrounding country - if the country is wide and open, you get wide open vowels; if it's flat, you get flatness; and so on.

'Course, you don't need to be an expert to recognise that as rubbish, but it is nice to be vindicated by one...

4 Comments For This Post

  1. Cindylover1969 wrote:
    May 8, 2007 | Reply

    Yes, but you were saying about this lack of progress on Heroes... are there any programmes she's trying to get YOU to watch? Maybe a tradeoff is in order.

  2. Rob Buckley wrote:
    May 8, 2007 | Reply

    We watch the whole of Charmed season eight this weekend; we're watching American's Next Top Model right now; I think Project Runway or Project Catwalk is on later.

    I'm trading, my friend.

  3. Cindylover1969 wrote:
    May 9, 2007 | Reply

    Sounds to me like you've earned the right to force her to watch.

  4. Rob Buckley replied to Cindylover1969's comment:
    May 9, 2007 | Reply

    Not really the point though, is it? I want her to like it! She may watch it, but she'll never enjoy that way, will she?

    Softly, softly, etc, etc.

Leave a comment

Your comment
You can use HTML tags for style. To hide a spoiler, put <span class="spoiler"> before it and </span> after it.


Comment preview

Subscribe to comments
You can subscribe by email to any further comments on this entry by checking the box below.

Featured Articles

Wallander 1x1

It's grim up north

Read the article

Asides

  • Mon 24 Nov: I'm going to be very busy until Thursday so chances are I won't be doing much reviewing of Survivors, 24: Redemption et al. Sorry!
  • Tue 18 Nov: Does it count in the CSI: Miami drinking game if David Caruso and Emily Procter are apparently in the same scene together, but they never speak to each other and you never see both their faces at the same time?
  • Sat 15 Nov: The Ascent of Money "sponsored by Cayman Islands". Huh. What's going on there then?
RSS feed