Tuesday's news

Posted on March 27, 2007 | 4 comments |

Radio Times covers

Doctor Who

Books/Comics

  • Neil Gaiman's doing a book-signing at Forbidden Planet on Friday

Film

  • The original Transformers movie gets a re-release in London
  • Michael Biehn might have a part in James Cameron's Avatar. QFS.

British TV

  • Philip Glenister from Life on Mars slags off British TV [free registration required]

US TV

  • Lots of BSG interviews. Looks like Caprica's off, though
  • Piper Perabo is going to be House's love interest. Maybe.
  • More pilot casting, with The Thick of It getting a lead at last
  • The usual spoilers from Kristen this week, including a forthcoming Lost fatality, Prison Break fatalities, and a Heroes fatality

Subscribe to the daily news by RSS or email

Read other posts about: , , , ,

4 Comments For This Post

  1. Mark H Wilkinson wrote:
    March 27, 2007 | Reply

    This question may seem off topic but it's actually inspired by one of the stories linked here: what do you consider good journalist practice regarding spoilers? I mean, in your book, what does or doesn't constitute something you can mention without saying 'Warning! Spoilers ahead!' or similar.

  2. Rob Buckley replied to Mark H Wilkinson's comment:
    March 27, 2007 | Reply

    Depends. I usually judge it on the basis of whether it'll materially affect the viewing of an episode. So saying that someone's going to die at some point in Lost isn't a real spoiler because Lost has people die all the time and I don't specify which episode. Saying someone will die in a particular episode would be a spoiler; saying that someone will die in Ugly Betty, say, is a spoiler because that's an irregular happening and the mere fact someone is going to die would be an important change of tack for the producers.

    Normally, I just try to make sure there's enough ambiguity that those who want to be spoiled can find out more and those that don't won't know for sure.

  3. Mark H Wilkinson replied to Rob Buckley's comment:
    March 28, 2007 | Reply

    What prompted this was that there was a bit of a kerfuffle when people mentioned the Doc-Martha kiss on LJ doctorwho without putting in a spoiler cut. Despite its being pimped all over the place by the BBC, posting something along the lines of what you wrote above would get the militants baying for a poster's blood.

    Thing is, I have difficulty seeing how that little, context free as it is, could be considered a spoiler. So I thought I'd ask your opinion.

    Fandom is madness.

  4. Rob Buckley replied to Mark H Wilkinson's comment:
    March 30, 2007 | Reply

    I didn't mention who did the snogging, just that the clip involved it. Besides, this ain't LJ. There's a certain degree of "newsiness" about this site, while LJ is a bit more of a forum.

Leave a comment

Your comment
You can use HTML tags for style. To hide a spoiler, put <span class="spoiler"> before it and </span> after it.


Comment preview

Subscribe to comments
You can subscribe by email to any further comments on this entry by checking the box below.

Featured Articles

The Sarah Jane Adventures 2x10

Is this a TARDIS I see before me?

Read the article

Asides

  • Mon 24 Nov: I'm going to be very busy until Thursday so chances are I won't be doing much reviewing of Survivors, 24: Redemption et al. Sorry!
  • Tue 18 Nov: Does it count in the CSI: Miami drinking game if David Caruso and Emily Procter are apparently in the same scene together, but they never speak to each other and you never see both their faces at the same time?
  • Sat 15 Nov: The Ascent of Money "sponsored by Cayman Islands". Huh. What's going on there then?
RSS feed