Archive | October 2006

Entries 1-6 of 131
Home page | Next

October 30, 2006

Third-episode verdict: Torchwood

Posted on October 30, 2006 at 10:03 | 11 comments |

Torchwood

So here we are already: episode three. Must be time for a verdict.

Continue reading "Third-episode verdict: Torchwood"

Read other posts about:

October 31, 2006

Traveler cut back

Posted on October 31, 2006 at 07:52 | Post a comment |

It hasn't even aired yet, but Traveler is now going to run to only eight episodes, rather than the original 13.

Subscribe to the daily news by RSS or email

Read other posts about:

Science Fiction Britannia

Posted on October 31, 2006 at 08:04 | 4 comments |

Science Fiction Britannia

There's a great big sci-fi season coming to BBC4 in early November. As well as interviews with Iain M Banks and Terry Pratchett, there's a dramatisation of John Wyndham's Random Quest, a three-part documentary on UK sci-fi writers and all sorts of goodies from the archives (allegedly).

There's also going to be a series called The Cult Of… that focuses on cult British sci-fi series: Blake's 7, Adam Adamant, Doomwatch, Star Cops, The Survivors and Tripods. I can understand all those obsessions except Tripods - Star Cops and Doomwatch were brilliant, Blake's 7 had its moments as did The Survivors, and Adam Adamant was fun. But Tripods? Lines from the books such as “And then they went into a village and stole some bread” turned into an entire episode? Dismal. Have you noticed that loving Doctor Who is no longer considered a cult pursuit by the Beeb, though? Interesting.

To coincide with the season, BBC4 will be opening up (from today) a web site called My Science Fiction Life, where you can deposit your memories of sci-fi shows and books, some of which might be used in a “new TV programme”. They don't mention whether that'll be The Cult Of… or not.

Subscribe to the daily news by RSS or email

Read other posts about:

Torchwood ratings in

Posted on October 31, 2006 at 08:08 | Post a comment |

The ratings are in for Sunday night and Torchwood's third episode lost 40% of the audience for episodes one and two, only getting 1.5 million viewers. I say only, but that still makes it the most watched multichannel show of the evening.

Subscribe to the daily news by RSS or email

Read other posts about:

Why Liz Shaw had to go

Posted on October 31, 2006 at 09:21 | 2 comments |

Without wishing to start a new almost-war, I thought this little snippet from the Backlash… sorry, BBC Doctor Who web site was of interest:

Another element of the seventh season with which both Letts and Dicks had been dissatisfied was Liz Shaw. This was on the basis that the independent, self-confident scientist had little need to rely on the Doctor for explanations and so, in their eyes, failed to fulfil the basic dramatic functions of aiding plot exposition and acting as a point of audience identification. Letts therefore decided against renewing actress Caroline John's contract for a further season and the two men set about devising a new companion for the Doctor.

Anyway, here's a little clip of Liz Shaw in action from my third most favourite story, The Ambassadors of Death. The clip is actually an example of the current restoration work being done by Ian Levine and co, so the quality of the first half is rubbish. And I don't mean the story.

Is three enough?

Posted on October 31, 2006 at 09:44 | 5 comments |

I'm getting worried. As you may (or may not) know, I do a “third-episode verdict” thing here. The general argument is that a pilot episode is always unrepresentative of a series, since it has a bigger budget, the format is still a bit fluid, characters might change or get recast and so on. So shows can often become completely different once they start their runs. Usually, though, the third episode is enough to see if the show is going to be worth sticking with.

Or so I thought. But now all the big new US shows are serials. They all have running themes. And they've all either got good or dropped off from around the fourth or fifth episode: Heroes, Jericho, Battlestar Galactica, even Men in Trees, apparently, although I've stopped watching, of course. Robin Hood, depending on whom you talk to, either got really good (a regular got killed) or really bad (Robin fires pies over Nottingham Castle's walls) during the fourth episode.

What do you think? Should I change the system to “fifth-episode verdict”? It'll be next to useless for British shows (“Here's a show you should have been watching. You can catch the last episode next week”). There'll be some delayed gratification. And it means I'm going to have to sit through possibly two additional episodes of rubbish for each new show, something I'm not exactly looking forward to if they're all like Brothers and Sisters. But I'll fall on that sword for you guys if you want me to.

Read other posts about: , ,

Entries 1-6 of 131
Home page | Next

Featured Articles

Lost Gems: The Ice House

A ghost story without ghosts

Read the article

Asides

  • Had I been paying proper attention, I'd have noticed that Stephen Moyer, who plays the seemingly friendly vampire in True Blood, also played the seemingly friendly vampire best pal of Jack Davenport in Ultraviolet

  • Don't forget the Sky+ competition. Deadline for entries is Monday 21st July 2008

  • Lab Rats: BBC2, Thursdays, 9.30pm. Laughter count: a few, I guess. Not awful, not bad for a first episode, but needs some work. And it does have both Chris Addison and Geoff McGivern in it.

RSS feed

Amazon goodies

  • Sisters of the Flame
  • The Cazalets
  • Remember Me (Sapphire and Steel)
  • Love Actually
  • Gideon's Daughter
  • Mine All Mine
  • To The Ends Of The Earth
  • Porterhouse Blue
  • The Andromeda Strain - The Mini-Series
  • Gods Behaving Badly

See all audio play or DVD reviews

Shrine to the blog gods

  • Charlie Brooker
  • Stewart Lee
  • Chris Morris
  • Douglas Camfield
  • Graeme Harper
  • Joanna Page
  • David Tennant
  • Verity Lambert

Find out more about the blog gods