Categorised | Film

The burgeoning trade in directors' commentaries, real or otherwise

Posted on August 16, 2006 | 1 comment |

Time was, directors' commentaries on DVDs were an optional extra. You knew you had a classy DVD if there was a commentary.

Nowadays, if you put out a DVD, an investigative hearing will be convened if you don't have a commentary track, no matter how bad.

Commentaries are even springing up before the DVDs come out; you can download the Doctor Who commentaries and Battlestar Galactica commentaries the night the episode airs then list to them while you watch a recording of the show.

But there's also an odd trade growing in fake commentaries.

Rob Brydon had a short-lived series called Directors Commentary that aired briefly in the London region back in 2004 and is now doing well, surprisingly enough, on DVD. In it, he pretends to be the original director of TV shows such as Flambards, Bonanza and The Bounder, dishing out completely made up facts and horrendous prejudice along the way.

Adam Buxton's also got in on the act with his own fake commentaries using the character of Ken Korda. Korda is due to appear on the DVD of The IT Crowd narrating a spoof behind-the-scenes documentary about the show. He's also appeared on Charlie Brooker's Screen Wipe doing fake commentaries for The Mint:

These commentaries have one thing in common: the narrator pretends to be the director. But alternative commentaries have been around for far longer. There's the joy of The Rocky Horror Picture Show's audience commentary, for example.

Doctor Who fans are getting in on the act with their own podcast alternative commentaries, such as those offered by Tachyon TV.

Then there was Mystery Science Theater 3000, which had a group of robots and a solitary human watching rubbish science fiction movies and adding their own commentaries to the proceedings:

The star of later seasons of MST3K was Mike Nelson. He's now launched his own web site, RiffTrax, dedicated to alternative directors' commentaries. He's also trying to make money from them, since he charges $1.99 per RiffTrax.

I'm not sure I'd pay $1.99 for a fake commentary, particularly if I can't hear a sample, but it's an interesting experiment. Will this kind of commercial alternative commentary pan out? If it's good, it surely will.

But how much of an audience base is there, I wonder. How many people listen to the real commentaries? What do you think?

Updates and related entries

August 23, 2006: We've had fake directors' commentaries. Now fake outtakes are coming our way.
September 18, 2006: Some more alternative commentaries for you.
October 30, 2006: Mike Nelson is making fake directors' commentaries. Again.

Read other posts about:

1 Comment For This Post

  1. Rullsenberg wrote:
    August 17, 2006 | Reply

    Although they rarely stand up to repeated listens, I quite like commentaries (though my partner loaths them) and a fake one can be as much fun as the real ones (for example, the Tachyon TV ones are just great). Not sure about paying though, and I prefer to just make sure I have access to the film/series in its correct aspect ration and cleaned up in terms of sound/image.

Leave a comment

Your comment
You can use HTML tags for style. To hide a spoiler, put <span class="spoiler"> before it and </span> after it.


Comment preview

Subscribe to comments
You can subscribe by email to any further comments on this entry by checking the box below.

Featured Articles

The Sarah Jane Adventures 2x10

Is this a TARDIS I see before me?

Read the article

Asides

  • Mon 24 Nov: I'm going to be very busy until Thursday so chances are I won't be doing much reviewing of Survivors, 24: Redemption et al. Sorry!
  • Tue 18 Nov: Does it count in the CSI: Miami drinking game if David Caruso and Emily Procter are apparently in the same scene together, but they never speak to each other and you never see both their faces at the same time?
  • Sat 15 Nov: The Ascent of Money "sponsored by Cayman Islands". Huh. What's going on there then?
RSS feed