Categorised | TV reviews

Tags |

Lost reviews

Posted on May 3, 2006 | Post a comment |

I did warn you all that you weren't going to get answers. Bloody Lost.

“Remember what happened last time round, how empty and cheated you felt at the end? What makes you think it'll be any different this time? It's televisual crack, you know it is. 'I can handle it,' you'll keep telling yourself. You can't though. Just say no.”
Sam Wollaston, The Guardian

“Throughout last night's two episodes, the programme's existing mysteries remained as mysterious - and numerous - as ever.”
James Walton, The Daily Telegraph

“Already the dependency is as bad as ever.”
Thomas Sutcliffe, The Independent

“Personally, I couldn't bear to go on to watch episode two of Lost, which followed on straight afterwards.”
Peter Paterson, Daily Mail

“Lost appears to be scripted by a team of lawyers, who answer every question with a 10-page booklet of further questions.”
Matt Baylis, Daily Express and Daily Star

Read other posts about:

Leave a comment

Your comment
You can use HTML tags for style. To hide a spoiler, put <span class="spoiler"> before it and </span> after it.


Comment preview

Subscribe to comments
You can subscribe by email to any further comments on this entry by checking the box below.

Featured Articles

Clone 1x1

Attack of the Americans

Read the article

Asides

  • Tue 18 Nov: Does it count in the CSI: Miami drinking game if David Caruso and Emily Procter are apparently in the same scene together, but they never speak to each other and you never see both their faces at the same time?
  • Sat 15 Nov: The Ascent of Money "sponsored by Cayman Islands". Huh. What's going on there then?
  • Sun 02 Nov: Do you think it's deliberate that Sam's mom in the US version of Life on Mars is called Rose Tyler?
RSS feed